From: https://www.mostlymetrics.com/p/how-cfos-think-about-software-spend
Today I want to talk about software and tooling spend from a non-technical perspective. But first, Iâve got to level with you - I donât know what half the things we buy âdoâ (Stitch vs Fivetran anyone?)
What I can attest to is that thereâs a business case behind why we need each tool, supported by an executive who is directly accountable for results. We trust leaders to make decisions on what tools they need to get the most out of their teams.
At the end of the day, software is about enabling people to build. And you canât separate the people from the technology. If you change the people, you change the technology, and vice versa. The improvements come from improving one or both. But changing one or both will change the other as well. (Paraphrasing a knowledge bomb this product guru once dropped on meâŠ)
Stop talking âGet back to the numbers, Budget Boyâ But back to budgetingâŠI look at Finance, and FP&A specifically, not as software decision makers (in most cases), but as the brokers between the business unit, the company P&L, and the vendor trying to gain our biz.
Itâs the finance departmentâs job to understand:
What type of tool it is - Critical infrastructure, productivity, communication, security, G&A
How we pay for it - Usage based, headcount based, license based, transaction based, hybrid
When we pay for it - Annually up-front, monthly in-arrears, quarterly up-front etc.
Unintended consequences - Do we have the bandwidth to implement this? Are there any other tools this takes the place of?
Types of Tools Iâve taken a shot at bucketing these in relative order of importance. When someone brings a tool to me and asks for budget, I instantly think - Is this a vitamin or a painkiller? In other words, does our business cease to exist without this? Does this improve something we already are doing? Is this a nice to have?
The following is a general stack ranking of tools by âbucketâ.
Tier 1: Keep the Lights On Critical Infrastructure (AWS, Snowflake, GCP)
Security (Crowdstrike, Jfrog, DataDog)
Engineering (Gitlab, Docker, Postman)
Finance / Accounting (Quickbooks, NetSuite, Xero)
Money In, Money Out (ADP, Bill.com, Ramp)
Communication (Slack, Gsuite, Zoom)
Tier 2: Run the Business Workforce Management (Workday, Bamboo HR, Gusto)
Sales (Salesforce, Docusign)
Customer Support (Ask Nicely, Zen Desk, Churnzero)
Marketing (Hubspot, Mailchimp, Marketo)
Finance (Carta, NetSuite, Ramp)
Recruiting (Greenhouse, Workable, Linkedin)
Databases (Tableau, Grafana, MongoDB)
Design (Figma, Fullstory, Adobe)
Tier 3: Run the Business Better Project Management (Miro, Clickup, Asana)
Budgeting (DataRails, Adaptive Insights, Vena)
Expense Management (Expensify, Tripactions, TravelPerk)
Meeting Management (Calendly, Chilipiper, Vidyard)
Analytics and Nice Charts (Sigma, Looker, Chartio)
Sales Efficiency (Gong, Zoominfo, Linkedin Sales Navigator)
Research (Pitchbook, Crunchbase, CapIQ)
People Tools (Lattice, Culture Amp, WorkHuman)
Modern Marketing Tools (Jasper.ai, SproutSocial, Podium)
Treasury and Procurement (Kyriba, Coupa, Ivalua)
How do we pay for it? In the words of Mac Miller - âCTCâŠCut the check!â
This informs how we budget for it.
Generally speaking, the easiest tools to budget for are those linked to headcount. What can be tricky, though, is nailing down if the tool is exclusive to one department. For example, if everyone needs a Gitlab license in engineering, thatâs a pretty finite group to forecast for. You just scale the spend with the departmentâs forecasted headcount each month.
But with cross-team collaboration tools like Miro, this can go haywire real fast. For example, someone in Biz Dev just sent me a real neato market landscape overview they spun up in Miro. I clicked to view their book report, only to find out later from the head of Product (who âownsâ the tool) that I (a member of finance) am now chewing up one of our paid Miro licenses. License proliferation is a real thing.
But, I digress. Here are the three most common ways to pay for a tool:
Seat Based Subscription (Recurring): The tried and true. You pay, say, $8 bucks for each person who uses Slack per month.
Consumption (Usage Based): Now this can have different flavors. A lot of times you pre-pay for credits to get a better rate. Other times you just get billed based on a flat rate at the end of each month. AWS and Snowflake are the easiest examples.
Hybrid (Mix and Match): ZoomInfo is the king of this. They blend the two models above. They charge you a per seat subscription fee and then layer on a fee based on credits. Itâs genius (for them).
Transaction Based (Take Rate): You pay a percent of whatever your transaction volume is. Stripe is the most common example. You get hit with ~3% per transaction. Quickbooks can also charge you a variable fee based on stuff you bill (in addition to the subscription).
Big Tonyâs Enterprise All You Can Eat Tier: The company gets unlimited access to the same shared resources and just pays one big fee. This is typically reserved for, say, the Walmarts of the world who can buy tens of thousands of licenses. You gotta spend a lot to get this type of deal, and usually commit for multiple years.
Mostly metrics is a reader-supported publication. Upgrade to paid so I donât have to take ad money from a company that sells mattresses on the internet.
Type your email⊠Subscribe When do we pay for it? When I go into a negotiation, my primary lever is trying to knock them down on price. But when that well is tapped, the next lever I go to is payment terms.
Even if we are accruing the expense each month of the year from an accounting standpoint, I also want to look out for my balance sheet and try to give it some breathing room.
Now, these two levers are not isolated. Sometimes I will pay for something annually, up-front, if I can get better pricing. Itâs a tradeoff you should be willing to make if they come down enough.
It does eventually become more art than science though as to where the approach shifts.
When you think about the length of the contract, consider if your organization is forecasted to grow and if you will be able to return to the negotiating table in a year to get better unit economics.
What you have to weigh with that consideration is the impact of inflation. Sometimes itâs better to lock in a long term deal because a.) the discounting is better and b.) you think theyâll raise prices due to macro conditions.
Hang onto that one Unintended Consequences Donât Double Pay What are we currently using today?
What goes away?
Does this replace any existing tools?
Is this duplicative?
You donât need both Asana and Monday. Pick one.
Users impacted Will any other groups use this tool?
Have you talked to them?
Spoiler alert: The answer is usually âUm, no(t yet)â
Donât sign another leader up for a tool they didnât demo. And similarly, donât cancel a tool they are using because you want a different brand that does the same thing.
Hidden Fees Are there any one-time platform fees?
Are there any implementation fees?
Do we have to hire a third party to install this stuff?
Is this âenoughâ capacity we are signing up for? Will we blow through this initial tier? Have you back tested it with a forecast?
It sucks when you have to pay a huge implementation fee. Once at a company I worked at we hired a third party to implement NetSuite for us, and it was 2.5x the cost of the first year subscription. Yikes.
And I use the phrase âimplement for usâ very loosely. The implementation became 30% of everyoneâs full time job. We lost time and money in order to spend money on a tool to mange our money. And imagine ripping that thing out after FINALLY getting it installed? Youâll replace the office carpet twice before NetSuite goes anywhere.
And sometimes costs are hidden in the sense that you are signing up for an artificially low tier. Donât get suckered in - if it feels too good to be true, it probably is. âItâs so cheap! It only starts at $1,000 per month for 100 documents!â.
OK, but we send out 200 per month, Dale.
And by then, theyâll already have their talons in and be riding your growth to the promised land of quota achievement.
Bandwidth Do people have time to get value from this tool?
Is it just for people managers?
Do people have time to implement this tool?
Are there any other implementations going on this quarter?
You donât want to buy Gong if you have a flat sales hierarchy and thereâs no one with the time to listen to the calls.
And in my experience, you donât want the org to implement more than one major tool simultaneously. All the project managers will be booked up and people are busy enough doing their day jobs. Plus, you donât want to move two pieces of cheese at once. Especially if they depend on each other. One time we tried to knock out NetSuite and an FP&A tool simultaneously. As youâd expect, it was like trying to nail Jello to a tree.
Fine Print Is there an auto renewal clause?
Do they get to use our logo in advertising materials?
Read the whole contract. I know, itâs boring. But you canât really outsource this part. The buck stops with you (well, unless you hire McKinsey or Deloitte to make the decision, then you have culpable deniability).
What Iâve been reading FP&A gave me a super power - it allowed me to ask anyone in the company anything about their department. When you broker the budget, you can ask the questions. Itâs like a license to learn. And about 17,793 questions later, this got me to CFO. Needless to say, I think FP&A expedites your learning curve.
My friend Nicolas Boucher is sharing awesome FP&A tips on LinkedIn. In particular, I love his infographics which make complex concepts easy to read and absorb.
Nicolas has helped more than 200 people get into FP&A with his online video course.
If you want to move into FP&A, this is what you need!
Quote Iâve been pondering âA man who makes the trip to the Caribbean by land once is a hero, the man who does it twice is a foolâ
-The Fish that Ate the Whale, by Rich Cohen
Mostly archives Building Finance Teams: The lifecycle of beancounters
The Game Inside the Game: PE vs VC
What Product Market Fit Feels Like: More than a number more like a feeling
Subscribe to Mostly metrics By CJ Gustafson · Launched 2 years ago
Mostly metrics. Business insights you can actually understand. Join +16,000 Startup Operators, VCs and CFOs who subscribe.
Type your email⊠Subscribe Like Comment Share
36 likes 6 Comments
Write a commentâŠ
Shomik Ghosh Writes Software Snack Bites Jan 24 Liked by CJ Gustafson Amazing post CJ! Super helpful for founders to understand how finance influences companies buying products!
2 Reply Gift a subscription Collapse 1 reply by CJ Gustafson
Greg G Jan 24 Liked by CJ Gustafson This is great. The part Iâm really curious about, maybe for another post, is how the discussion with the leader wanting to buy a tool goes, whether they really need to have a business case, and how much you poke at it. Do you end up having conversations like whether you really need Tableau or Miro, and how does âreally needâ end up getting defined? Do you diplomatically call BS if someone says the company growth rate will be 1% higher if you buy Podium (just picking an example out of the hat)?
In my experience, leaders often have pretty optimistic business cases. Many times, theyâre also difficult to define or measure. How can we tell if weâre collaborating better with Miro?
Anyway, I know this topic could fill a book, but Iâm mostly curious about the war stories.
2 Reply Gift a subscription Collapse 1 reply by CJ Gustafson 4 more comments⊠M&A Strategies How to evaluate your acquisition landscape CJ GUSTAFSON JAN 3 31 How much dilution is ânormalâ? When are you getting overly diluted? CJ GUSTAFSON JAN 17 26 9 The 2022 SaaS Fundraising Napkin Insights on last yearâs Seed through IPO rounds, all on one page CJ GUSTAFSON DEC 20, 2022 27 2 See all Ready for more? Type your email⊠Subscribe © 2023 CJ Gustafson Privacy â Terms â Collection notice Start Writing Get the app Substack is the home for great writing